검색창 열기 인더뉴스 부·울·경

Issue Plus 이슈+

[iSSF 2020]“Culture, from a Scale Economy to a Depth Economy”...COVID-19 is a Chance for Us to Discover Our Personal Preference

URL복사

Thursday, September 03, 2020, 09:09:00

Interview with Ildong JOE, Assistant Professor in the Division of Global Korean Studies at the Academy of Korean Studies
“It is a similar turning point to the IMF crisis. Indie genres will be emphasized more than universality”

 

iN THE NEWS Reporter Eunsil YOO | The entire world has stopped. This includes South Korea, a society where speed is a virtue, and the speed of life was becoming even faster. The global economic system that was in an endless competition slammed on the brakes due to an obstacle called COVID-19.

 

The pandemic spread at lightning speed across continental bor-ders has stopped all human activity. Unrealistic scenarios are now restructuring the way we live our lives. The disaster movies that only appeared on the movie screens have become a reality for us and brilliant contactless technologies in sci-fi movies are now a part of our daily lives.

 

“#Alive”, “Peninsula”, “Pandemic” These are the titles of disaster movies released in Korean theaters this summer. Movies reflect our lives, and the title contains the theme of life. We can use the words in these titles to form the question, “How should we live on the Korean Peninsula in the age of pandemic?”

 

It is even more difficult to make ‘contactless activities’ common in popular culture where ‘communication’ and ‘meeting’ are crucial. The three multiplex companies in Korea suffered operating losses of at least KRW 240 billion in the first half of this year alone. The concert industry, which was already in a bad situation before the pandemic, recorded an unrecoverable loss of 87.7 billion won (announced by the Record Label Industry Association of Korea) as of early July.

 

Many are raising concerns regarding whether we can communicate and empathize with each other through movies, music, and dancing in a society where people need to maintain an appropriate distance.

 

Assistant Professor Ildong JOE from the Division of Global Korean Studies at the Academy of Korean Studies is the third speaker at the “2nd iNdividual Survival Strategy Forum 2020: How to Survive In The Post-Coronavirus Era?” that will be hosted by iN THE NEWS on September 2. I had the opportunity to talk with him about changes in the way we meet, communicate, and spaces in the COVID-19 era and the future of popular culture.

 

 

I’m sure you experienced significant changes as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. How are you doing?

 

“Since I usually teach a small number of graduate students at a time rather than many undergraduates, I am used to teaching students face-to-face. I usually have about 6-7 students in a class, but now I teach over Zoom instead of in a classroom.

 

As I began to teach my students this way, I experienced some difficulties. It was difficult for me to figure out what they wanted to say and what they were thinking. The online environment definite-ly makes it difficult to share each other’s feelings compared to an offline environment. There are no issues with contactless classes when it comes to delivering accurate facts, but there are limits when we need to have debates or talk about things that don’t have an exact answer.”

 

Were there any positive changes?

 

“There are some things that are disappointing to me regarding contactless classes, but it could be an opportunity for some people. I had a student who gave birth right before the semester began, and she probably would have had to take a break from school if the classes took place offline. She was able to attend this semester through online classes, which has no physical or spatial limitations.

 

There was also a significant change for me as a researcher. I have been participating in two online forums since this semester, and I am running one of them with foreign scholars. Anthropologists from the United States, Japan, Czech, and other countries are running the forum with me, and at first, I doubted whether the forum could be managed well because the time difference between countries was so huge.

 

However, it didn’t turn out to be a big problem as I’ve expected since we were all willing to make sacrifices on what time to meet. It is actually great because we can talk comfortably and share each other’s knowledge. I am actually experiencing global ‘connectivity.’”

 

Everyone is quickly switching over to contactless methods across society and the economy due to the impact of COVID-19. How far do you think we’ve come?

 

“As we struggled with COVID-19, we’ve come to realize that we were already living a relatively contactless lifestyle even before this pandemic. The concept of “contactless” in Korea is different from that of “hikikomori” in Japan, which involves disconnection and withdrawal.

 

Korea with its ultra-high-speed internet is an “early adapters’ society”, so there are many people who are used to a contactless way of life. I looked for how many things I had that I bought offline, but there weren’t many. Lots of shopping malls, banks, etc. were already using contactless methods, although there may be differ-ences in the degree to which these contactless methods are used. I believe this is one of the main reasons why Korea suffered minimal damage from COVID-19 compared to other countries.

 

However, I do have a few concerns as the rate at which this switch to contactless methods speeds up. I’m worried that we’ll end up be-coming a society that is closed off from communication. When we talk to someone in person, we communicate based on context and we can make more free and enriched expression because words are volatile.

 

On the other hand, when we have conversations through text, context becomes less clear and there’s a high chance that our level of understanding regarding the other person will fall. Since text records last a long time, even simple errors are often unacceptable.

 

I think the frequency of conversations will decrease, and the self-censorship will be enhanced. Eventually, our society could turn into a “cliquey” society where we only interact with people we like. I’m concerned that we’ll become a society that keeps our mouth closed until we find someone who is perfectly congenial to me.”

 

Popular culture has also suffered greatly at the hands of COVID-19.

 

“In a popular culture society, people with the same taste gather and consume together. The most charming aspect of the performance is that you can feel like you are interacting with your favorite artists in the venue. As social distancing has become a part of our daily lives due to COVID-19, it has become very difficult for everyone to be ‘together.’ The damage was probably greater for indie musicians whose livelihood was based on communicating with the audience at concerts.

 

The same goes for movie theaters. In order for a multiplex theater to maintain its business, there must be at least 40 audiences per screen, but the problem isn’t about numbers right now. It’s about whether or not people can even go to the movies anymore. In Korea, everything from filming a movie to distribution and playing it in theaters is directly connected, so the industry suffers more in situations such as these.

 

The problem will become more serious next year. The film industry may be able to withstand the current situation with the movies that have been filmed earlier. However, the production of many films is currently suspended, so next year there are only a few films that can be shown in theaters.”

 

I heard that there was a surge in Netflix users across the globe as a result of the pandemic. What do you think about the growth of powerful content platforms such as Netflix?

 

“COVID-19 did indeed serve as a catalyst for increasing Netflix sub-scribers, but I’d like to focus more on the fact that we haven’t been able to see high-quality content so far. I believe the main factor of Netflix’s growth is that it opened up a space for various content.

 

Prior to Netflix, we didn’t have many opportunities to watch mov-ies, dramas, or documentaries in various genres created by various countries, but Netflix has made it possible.

 

Today, we can watch a Turkish drama or Indian movie in the com-fort of our homes and people living in Argentina now know who Kang Ha-neul is from watching ‘When the Camellia Blooms.’”

 

 

How will popular culture change in the post-COVID 19 era?

 

“The impression of space is important at an offline concert. The audience that is jumping up and down and cheering beside you and the satisfaction of being with your favorite musician fills up that space. The meaning of collective action significance is extremely important at a concert venue.

 

However, there are also physical limitations. If your seat is too far from the stage, you can’t see the artist’s facial expression or ges-tures and you can’t hear the music very well.

 

As concert spaces went online, people were able to experience a more pristine sound. They could also see the singer’s facial expres-sion or catch mistakes in the choreography easily. Musicians say that they are much more nervous when they have online concerts. As a result, the quality of performance is improving.

 

One other change that we can expect is that the era of ‘person-al preference’ will come. More people will find their music taste through streaming even if they don’t own a CD, and at the same time, a system that finds everyone’s ‘personal preference’ will be developed.

 

If we just look at iTunes, they have an algorithm that finds songs that you might like based on your song selection data. Preferences are bound to become more specific and specialized, and popular culture may become pluralized based on personal preferences rath-er than focusing on superstars.”

 

BTS,Exo,and other artists have successfully held concerts re-cently. Some people say that the polarization of popular culture will become even more serious due to COVID-19.

 

“The online concerts you mentioned that were organized by big entertainment companies are getting closer to VR with very high quality. Billie Eilish recently held an online concert using virtual technology. Upon entering the concert, viewers were faced with the option to experience it “solo” or enter “social mode.”

 

With the social mode, you can experience a high level of technol-ogy. The technology even allows you to interact with the person next to you. They created an online concert that allowed people to experience the feeling of being there with other people. Only major entertainment companies can do this.

 

However, I don’t think this is the core part of popular culture. The gap between the rich and poor may get bigger depending on whether online concerts can be held through technology and cap-ital, but there is doubt regarding how much longer superstars will remain in power. This is because I consider COVID 19 pandemic as a turning point.

 

During the IMF crisis in 1998, a K-pop singer Jo Sung-mo and a rock-band No Brain received the music video award together at one of the awards ceremonies. Jo Sung-mo’s music video can be seen as the start of blockbuster-level music videos as 150 million won was invested in the video, which was a lot in the 90s, with a star-studded cast that included Lee Byung-hun and Kim Ha-neul.

 

Compared to this monumental video, the rock-band No Brain received the same award for a music video filmed with a budget of 300,000. While Jo’s music video followed the conventional formula where more investments yield greater returns, No Brain went the exact opposite.

 

If it weren’t for the powerful external variable of a currency crisis, everyone’s attention would have been on the superstars as usual. Ironically, the currency crisis created a turning point in society and people’s personal preferences started becoming more specific and indie music started gaining popularity.

 

I think the current pandemic situation is similar to the crisis that occurred 20 years ago. This turning point and advancements on the internet will come together and indie genres will start to shine in the midst of popular culture for movies, music, etc. Beyond the scale of money and physical distance, this can be a great opportuni-ty for content creators such as musicians and movie producers who didn’t receive the spotlight. Of course, they must be able to offer a certain level of completion.”

 

Popular culture is another industrial field. We simply can’t over-look the economic aspects. Is it possible to predict the amount of economic loss we suffered as a result of COVID-19 and how much we will recover from those losses in the future?

 

“It’s difficult to estimate how much the popular culture industry has lost due to COVID-19, but it is clear that it has had an overwhelm-ing economic impact. It’s not as affected as the tourism industry that suffered the most, but those who work in the popular culture industry have been greatly impacted. The music festivals have always been the pivotal part of the music performance industry, but they’ve all been canceled or postponed. All the schedules of overseas musicians who planned to perform in Korea have also been canceled.”

 

How will the public consume culture from the perspective of consumers in the future?

 

“From a consumer point of view, people will be able to consume culture in a variety of ways to suit their specific preferences. For ex-ample, if you limit the number of people who can attend a concert due to social distancing at a venue, this translates to less profit. However, the audience may feel closer to the singers who are per-forming. This experience builds on your personal preferences and allows you to enjoy culture at a deeper level. I believe culture will move forward from the economy of scale to the economy of depth.”

 

Ildong JOE,Assistant Professor in the Division of Global Korean Studies at the Academy of Korean Studies

 

◇ Profile
Born in 1975
Bachelor’s degree in Cultural Anthropology at Hanyang University
Master’s degree in Cultural Anthropology at Hanyang University
Ph. D. in Philosophy at Hanyang University (Majored in Cultural Anthropology)
(Former) Researcher at the Academy of Korean Studies at Ewha Womans University
(Former) Academic research professor at the Institute of Trans-divi-sion and Border Studies at Shinhan University
(Present) Assistant Professor in the Division of Global Korean Stud-ies at the Academy of Korean Studies.
(Present) Selection Committee Member of the Korean Music Awards
(Present) Member of the Executive Committee of the Korea Interna-tional Ethnographic Film Festival

 

English(中文·日本語) news is the result of applying Google Translate. <iN THE NEWS> is not responsible for the content of English(中文·日本語) news.

배너

유은실 기자 yes24@inthenews.co.kr

배너

신한금융 ESG 가치 5.5조 창출…진옥동 회장 “지속가능 사회 만들기 진력”

신한금융 ESG 가치 5.5조 창출…진옥동 회장 “지속가능 사회 만들기 진력”

2025.07.01 16:30:26

인더뉴스 문승현 기자ㅣ신한금융그룹(회장 진옥동)이 2024년 한해 창출한 ESG 가치(ESG Value Created)가 5조4545억원으로 집계됐습니다. 1일 신한금융이 발간한 '2024 지속가능경영보고서'를 보면 지난해 436개 ESG 프로그램을 통해 창출된 순수 사회적 가치는 2조9590억원입니다. 여기서 환경적비용(91억원)과 사회적비용(542억원)을 차감한 뒤 배당·납세 등 주요 이해관계자 대상의 환원성과(2조5589억원)을 더한 수치입니다. 신한금융은 ESG 활동성과 정량화와 체계적인 관리를 위해 연세대 ESG·기업윤리센터와 협력해 글로벌 금융회사 최초로 ESG 활동성과 측정모델 즉 '신한 ESG 가치 인덱스(Value Index)'를 개발했습니다. ESG 활동 효과를 '화폐가치'로 측정하는 것으로 2019년부터 그 결과를 공개하고 있습니다. ESG 가치를 처음 측정한 2019년과 비교하면 측정 대상 ESG 활동은 93개에서 436개로, 순수 사회적 가치는 7907억원에서 2조9590억원으로 279% 큰폭 증가했습니다. 신한금융의 주요 ESG 활동 중에서도 눈에 띄는 건 '브링업(Bring-Up) & 밸류업(Value-Up) 프로젝트' 입니다. 신한저축은행 중신용 고객이 낮은 금리의 신한은행 '신한상생 대환대출'로 갈아탈 수 있는 기회를 제공하는 게 핵심입니다. 저축은행 우량고객이 이탈한다고 볼 수 있지만 은행 거래 유입을 통해 신용등급 상향이나 금융비용 감면까지 지원해 그룹 전체 우량고객을 늘리고(Bring-Up), 고객이 스스로 가치를 높이는(Value-Up) '고객상생'의 선순환 구조를 실현했다는 평가가 나옵니다. 금융위원회가 '혁신금융서비스'로 지정한 것도 취약계층에 대한 신용개선과 금융비용 절감, 나아가 가계부채 부담완화에 기여하고 있다는 점을 인정한 결과로 여겨집니다. 신한금융은 지난 6월 기준 신한상생 대환대출을 통해 574명의 고객에 102억원의 대환대출을 실행했고 이들 고객은 평균 4.8%p 이자절감(누적 이자경감액 9억8000만원) 효과를 누렸습니다. 진옥동 신한금융 회장은 브링업&밸류업 프로젝트 100억원 돌파에 대해 "신한이 고객 이자감면에 따른 이익축소에도 중·저신용 고객의 신용 상향지원을 통해 상생을 실현한 의미있는 결과"라며 "그룹 미션인 '따뜻한 금융' 실천의지를 담아 고객과 상생을 위한 금융사다리 역할을 더 적극적으로 수행하겠다"고 의지를 밝혔습니다. 이번 보고서에는 TCFD(기후), TNFD(생물다양성) 등 글로벌 주요이슈와 관련해 그룹 차원의 대응현황을 심층적으로 다룬 '스페셜 리포트'도 담겼습니다. 신한금융은 글로벌 공동의 목표 '2050 넷제로(Net Zero)' 달성을 위해 2020년 동아시아 금융그룹 최초로 탄소중립전략인 '제로 카본 드라이브(Zero Carbon Drive)'를 선언하며 다양한 노력을 기울이고 있습니다. 녹색금융과 전환금융을 중심으로 한 '친환경 금융' 누적 실적은 2024년말 기준 총 18조7000억원에 달합니다. 2030년 30조원 달성목표의 62.3%에 해당하는 진도율입니다. 탄소배출 많은 산업의 친환경 전환을 위한 자금을 제공해 지속가능한 경제로 점진적 탈탄소화를 지원하는 전환금융 실적은 9605억원 규모로 집계됩니다. 이와 함께 TNFD 보고서에서는 그룹의 금융자산뿐 아니라 유형자산까지 포함해 '자연자본' 의존도와 영향 분석을 고도화한 내용을 담았습니다. 자연자본은 토양, 공기, 물, 광물 등 자연이 인류에 혜택을 제공하는 모든 자원을 포괄하는 개념입니다. 신한금융은 보고서에서 "금융업 특성상 직접적으로 자연자본과 관련된 의존도와 영향, 리스크 및 기회는 상대적으로 미미한 수준"이라며 "대부분의 자연자본 이슈는 투자 포트폴리오 즉 다운스트림 가치사슬(downstream value chain)을 통해 발생하는 경우가 많다"고 설명했습니다. 그러면서 "신한금융은 이러한 구조를 반영해 그룹 운영은 물론 투자 포트폴리오에 대해서도 자연자본 이슈가 투자기업에 미칠 수 있는 잠재적 영향을 종합적으로 검토하고 있다"고 밝혔습니다. 신한금융은 특히 올해로 20번째 발간된 지속가능경영보고서에서 글로벌 지속가능개발목표(SDGs)에 기반해 신한금융만의 독자적인 SDGs 전략 프레임워크를 수록하고 목표달성을 위한 지표·성과를 투명하게 공개하는 등 ESG 실행력을 강조했습니다. 진옥동 신한금융 회장은 "신한금융그룹은 '멋진 세상을 향한 올바른 실천' 이라는 슬로건 아래 우리 사회의 지속가능한 발전을 위해 최선을 다하고 있다"며 "앞으로도 금융이 할 수 있는 역할에 더욱 힘써서 탄소중립, 포용, 협력이라는 3대 전략방향에 따라 지속가능경영을 보다 체계적으로 펼쳐가겠다"고 말했습니다.


배너


배너